Differences

Many of the assumptions underlying RPi.GPIO – that it has complete access to, and control over, the registers controlling the GPIO pins – do not work when applied to the Linux gpiochip devices. To that end, while the library strives as far as possible to be “bug compatible” with RPi.GPIO, there are differences in behaviour that may result in incompatibility.

Bug Compatible?

What does being “bug compatible” mean? It is not enough for the library to implement the RPi.GPIO API. It must also:

  • Act, as far as possible, in the same way to the same calls with the same values

  • Raise the same exception types, with the same messages, in the same circumstances

  • Break (i.e. fail to operate correctly) in the same way, as far as possible

This last point may sound silly, but a library is always used in unexpected or undocumented ways by some applications. Thus anything that tries to take the place of that library must do more than simply operate the same as the “documented surface” would suggest.

That said, given that the underlying assumptions are fundamentally different this will not always be possible…

Pi Revision

The RPi.GPIO module attempts to determine the model and revision of Raspberry Pi board that it is running on when the module is imported, raising RuntimeError at import time if it finds it is not running on a Raspberry Pi. rpi-lgpio emulates this behaviour, but this can be inconvenient for certain situations including testing, but also usage of rpi-lgpio on other single board computers.

To that end rpi-lgpio permits a Raspberry Pi revision code to be manually specified via the environment in the RPI_LGPIO_REVISION value. For example:

$ RPI_LGPIO_REVISION='c03114' python3
Python 3.10.6 (main, Aug 10 2022, 11:40:04) [GCC 11.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.RPI_INFO
{'P1_REVISION': 3, 'REVISION': 'c03114', 'TYPE': 'Pi 4 Model B',
'MANUFACTURER': 'Sony UK', 'PROCESSOR': 'BCM2711', 'RAM': '4GB'}
>>> exit()
$ RPI_LGPIO_REVISION='902120' python3
Python 3.10.6 (main, Aug 10 2022, 11:40:04) [GCC 11.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.RPI_INFO
{'P1_REVISION': 3, 'REVISION': '902120', 'TYPE': 'Zero 2 W',
'MANUFACTURER': 'Sony UK', 'PROCESSOR': 'BCM2837', 'RAM': '512M'}
>>> exit()

GPIO Chip

The lgpio library needs to know the number of the /dev/gpiochip device it should open. By default this will be calculated from the reported Pi Revision (which may be customized as detailed in that section). In practice this means the chip defaults to “4” on the Raspberry Pi Model 5B, and “0” on all other boards.

You may also specify the chip manually using the RPI_LGPIO_CHIP environment variable. For example:

$ ls /dev/gpiochip*
crw-------  1 root root    254, 0 Oct  1 15:00 /dev/gpiochip0
crw-------  1 root root    254, 1 Oct  1 15:00 /dev/gpiochip1
crw-------  1 root root    254, 2 Oct  1 15:00 /dev/gpiochip2
crw-------  1 root root    254, 3 Oct  1 15:00 /dev/gpiochip3
crw-rw----+ 1 root dialout 254, 4 Oct  1 15:00 /dev/gpiochip4
crw-------  1 root root    254, 5 Oct  1 15:00 /dev/gpiochip5
$ RPI_LGPIO_CHIP=5 python3
Python 3.11.5 (main, Aug 29 2023, 15:31:31) [GCC 13.2.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/RPi/GPIO/__init__.py", line 513, in setmode
    _chip = _check(lgpio.gpiochip_open(int(chip_num)))
                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lgpio.py", line 645, in gpiochip_open
    return _u2i(handle)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lgpio.py", line 458, in _u2i
    raise error(error_text(v))
lgpio.error: 'can not open gpiochip'

This is primarily useful for other boards where the correct gpiochip device is something other than 0.

Alternate Pin Modes

The gpio_function() function can be used to report the current mode of a pin. In RPi.GPIO this may return several “alternate” mode values including SPI, I2C, and HARD_PWM. rpi-lgpio will only ever return the basic IN and OUT values however, as the underlying gpiochip device cannot report alternate modes.

For example, under RPi.GPIO:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.gpio_function(2) == GPIO.I2C
True

Under rpi-lgpio:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.gpio_function(2) == GPIO.I2C
False
>>> GPIO.gpio_function(2) == GPIO.IN
True

Stack Traces

While every effort has been made to raise the same exceptions with the same messages as RPi.GPIO, rpi-lgpio does raise the exceptions from pure Python so the exceptions will generally include a larger stack trace than under RPi.GPIO. For example, under RPi.GPIO:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.IN)
>>> GPIO.output(26, 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RuntimeError: The GPIO channel has not been set up as an OUTPUT

Under rpi-lgpio:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.IN)
>>> GPIO.output(26, 1)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/dave/projects/rpi-lgpio/rpi-lgpio/RPi/GPIO.py", line 626, in output
    _check_output(mode, 'The GPIO channel has not been set up as an OUTPUT')
  File "/home/dave/projects/rpi-lgpio/rpi-lgpio/RPi/GPIO.py", line 242, in _check_output
    raise RuntimeError(msg)
RuntimeError: The GPIO channel has not been set up as an OUTPUT

Simultaneous Access

Two processes using RPi.GPIO can happily control the same pin. This is simply not permitted by the Linux gpiochip device and will fail under rpi-lgpio. For example, if another process has reserved GPIO26, and our script also tries to allocate it:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.OUT)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/dave/projects/rpi-lgpio/rpi-lgpio/RPi/GPIO.py", line 569, in setup
    initial = _check(lgpio.gpio_read(_chip, gpio))
  File "/home/dave/envs/rpi-lgpio/lib/python3.10/site-packages/lgpio.py", line 894, in gpio_read
    return _u2i(_lgpio._gpio_read(handle&0xffff, gpio))
  File "/home/dave/envs/rpi-lgpio/lib/python3.10/site-packages/lgpio.py", line 461, in _u2i
    raise error(error_text(v))
lgpio.error: 'GPIO not allocated'

Debounce

Debouncing of signals works fundamentally differently in RPi.GPIO, and in lgpio (the library underlying rpi-lgpio). Rather than attempt to add more complexity in between users and lgpio, which would also inevitably slow down edge detection (with all the attendant timing issues for certain applications) it is likely preferable to just live with this difference, but document it thoroughly.

RPi.GPIO debounces signals by tracking the last timestamp at which it saw a specified edge and suppressing reports of edges that occur within the specified number of milliseconds after that.

lgpio (and thus rpi-lgpio) debounces by waiting for a signal to be stable for the specified number of milliseconds before reporting the edge.

For some applications, there will be little/no difference other than rpi-lgpio reporting an edge a few milliseconds later than RPi.GPIO would (specifically, by the amount of debounce requsted). The following diagram shows the waveform from a “bouncy” switch being pressed once, along with the positions in time where RPi.GPIO and rpi-lgpio would report the rising edge when debounce of 3ms is requested:

 0ms    2ms     4ms     6ms     8ms
 |      |       |       |       |
 |      ┌─┐ ┌─┐ ┌─────────────────┐
 |      │ │ │ │ │           :     │
 |      │ │ │ │ │           :     │
 ───────┘ └─┘ └─┘           :     └────────────────────────
        :                   :
        :                   :
     RPi.GPIO             rpi-lgpio

RPi.GPIO reports the edge at 2ms, then suppresses the edges at 3ms and 4ms because they are within 3ms of the last edge. By contrast, rpi-lgpio ignores the first and second rising edges (because they didn’t stay stable for 3ms) and only reports the third edge at 7ms (after it’s spent 3ms stable).

However, consider this same scenario if debounce of 2ms is requested:

 0ms    2ms     4ms     6ms     8ms
 |      |       |       |       |
 |      ┌─┐ ┌─┐ ┌─────────────────┐
 |      │ │ │ │ │       :         │
 |      │ │ │ │ │       :         │
 ───────┘ └─┘ └─┘       :         └────────────────────────
        :       :       :
        :       :       :
    RPi.GPIO  RPi.GPIO  rpi-lgpio

In this case, RPi.GPIO reports the switch twice because the third edge is still 2ms after the first edge. However, rpi-lgpio only reports the switch once because only one edge stayed stable for 2ms. Also note in this case, that rpi-lgpio’s report time has moved back to 6ms because it’s not waiting as long for stability.

This implies that you may find shorter debounce periods preferable when working with rpi-lgpio, than with RPi.GPIO. They will still debounce effectively, but will reduce the delay in reporting edges.

One final scenario to consider is a waveform of equally spaced, repeating pulses (like PWM) every 2ms:

 0ms    2ms     4ms     6ms     8ms     10ms    12ms
 |      |       |       |       |       |       |
 |      ┌────┐  ┌────┐  ┌────┐  ┌────┐  ┌────┐  ┌────┐  ┌──
 |      │    │  │    │  │    │  │    │  │    │  │    │  │
 |      │    │  │    │  │    │  │    │  │    │  │    │  │
 ───────┘    └──┘    └──┘    └──┘    └──┘    └──┘    └──┘
        :               :               :               :
        :               :               :               :
   RPi.GPIO        RPi.GPIO        RPi.GPIO        RPi.GPIO

If we request rising edge detection with a debounce of 3ms, RPi.GPIO reports half of the edges; it’s suppressing every other edge as they occur within 3ms of the edge preceding them. rpi-lgpio, on the other hand, reports no edges at all because none of them stay stable for 3ms.

PWM on inputs

RPi.GPIO (probably erroneously) permits PWM objects to continue operating on pins that are switched to inputs:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.OUT)
>>> p = GPIO.PWM(26, 1000)
>>> p.start(75)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.IN)
>>> p.stop()
>>> p.start(75)
>>> p.stop()

This will not work under rpi-lgpio:

>>> from RPi import GPIO
>>> GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.OUT)
>>> p = GPIO.PWM(26, 1000)
>>> p.start(75)
>>> GPIO.setup(26, GPIO.IN)
>>> p.stop()
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/home/dave/projects/rpi-lgpio/rpi-lgpio/RPi/GPIO.py", line 190, in stop
    lgpio.tx_pwm(_chip, self._gpio, 0, 0)
  File "/home/dave/envs/rpi-lgpio/lib/python3.10/site-packages/lgpio.py", line 1074, in tx_pwm
    return _u2i(_lgpio._tx_pwm(
  File "/home/dave/envs/rpi-lgpio/lib/python3.10/site-packages/lgpio.py", line 461, in _u2i
    raise error(error_text(v))
lgpio.error: 'bad PWM micros'

Though note that the error occurs when the PWM object is next acted upon, rather than at the point when the GPIO is switched to an input.